Deckmasters 2001 Theme DeckRichard: Why I built this deck and how to play it
When I was first asked whether I would be interested in building a deck to challenge Jon, my reaction was simple: 'Absolutely. I can't lose!' What did I mean by this? Well, of course I'll lose. But it won't be a real loss, because no one really expects me to win such a matchup. After all, if the inventor of basketball were to take on Michael Jordan in a game of one-on-one, I know where the smart money would be. But if I do win, what a victory! I'll earn endless glory. So on one hand I'd have no real loss, and on the other, endless glory. Not bad.
I decided to adopt a strategy that turned out to be a little... controversial. The first conclusion I came to is that my only real chance for beating Jon would be to guess what kind of deck he'll play, and then build a deck designed to beat it. Call it 'pre-sideboarding'. My second conclusion came from the matchup's unique metagame. I figured out that I could set up another win-win situation: I could build a deck full of cards that would normally be bad choices, such as main-deck color hosers and narrow-use cards, but that would destroy Jon - provided I guessed correctly what he would play. By doing this, I set up a gambit that Wizards R&D had to address. If I was right about Jon's deck, my color hosers and conditional cards would make it seem like I had read Jon's mind. And if I guessed incorrectly what Jon would play, Wizards would have to step in and make me change my deck. Otherwise they'd end up with a product that players wouldn't like at all. Devious but brilliant!
The next step was to determine what Jon would play - not an easy task. Wizards chose a card pool that would challenge Jon and me equally: Ice Age and Alliances. Given the cards from those sets, as well as Wizards' reprint policy, I concluded that Jon would have to play a two-color deck. There simply aren't enough cards of any one color in this environment to build a strong monocolored deck. I also ruled out white, which doesn't have a whole lot to offer in reprintable common and uncommon cards. That left me with a fifty percent chance of guessing one of the coors he would play.
I consulted the rest of Wizards R&D, of course, about what they though Jon might play. But as I expected, I got lots of different answers. Some, like Randy Buhler and Worth Wollpert, were absolutely positive Jon would play blue. "Until they're banned, he'll use islands in every format he plays," they said, and I knew there were enough quality blue cards available to support a solid blue deck (with some help from a second color - probably red). But others, including Michael Donais, thought Jon wouldn't necessarily choose blue. He would just build the strongest all-around deck, regardless of his own color preferences. This seemed like the more realistic opinion to me. But since blue seemed as a good a choice as red, black, or green, I settled my guess: Jon would play a blue deck, probably with red or black as a second color.
My next task was to build a deck that would beat blue. Michael Donais built the best blue deck he could for the format, which for him meant a blue-red deck. My first attempt was a really fast beatdown deck that would overrun the slow, reactive "counter-burn" strategy. But there just aren't enough aggressive Ice Age and Alliances weenies to make this kind of deck work. I also knew that playing blue would be like challenging Jon on his home turf. So I swung to the opposite extreme: all the huge green creatures I could get my hands on, with plenty of red control spells to back them up.
Testing revealed the big-creature approach to be pretty strong. The fact that Jon and I could use only two of any card meant that he couldn't load up on Incinerates or Pyroclasms, which makes the gigantic Yavimaya Ancients and the wily Walking Wall tougher to exterminate. I also decided to put in some artifact-destroying spells, as I was all but positive I would encounter some Phyrexian War Beasts and Icy Manipulators. Then, true to my initial strategy, I put in a bunch of cards to hose blue, including Pyroblast, Burnout, and Thoughtleech.
The gist of the deck's concept is dead simple: Drop creatures as fast as you can, and use the red spells to clear the way for them to attack. Most of the creatures in the deck have such a high toughness that red burn spells won't kill them, and you'll win most ground battles when push comes to shove. What happens if the game stalls out before your big creatures can stomp your opponent? My deck has a few answers to that question. First, nothing beats reusable direct damage, so milk those Death Sparks for all they're worth. Try to attack or blick in such a way that if you lose a creature, it will plop right down on top of a Death Spark in your graveyard. Second, Elkin Bottle can give you enough card advantage to break through a stalemate. It also skirts that pesky 'only two of a card' rule. Finally, there's Jokulhaups. If you draw this bomb, wait patiently until your opponent overextends, then reset the board and march toward victory. Endless glory, here we come!
You'll never guess what happened. Okay, maybe you will. The Powers That Be decided that neither Jon nor I would be permitted to play color hosers. Jon didn't seem to mind this decision in the least, which implies either that he built his deck without considering the metagame at all, or that he anticipated that I would assume he's playing blue. If he has forseen that I would chose an anti-blue strategy, his best bet would be to build the best nonblue deck he could. And although the banning of color hosers affects six cards in my original deck, I was prepared for this contingency.
I submitted my Plan B deck, which replaces two Burnouts, two Pyroblasts, and two Thoughtleeches with two Giant Growths, two Giant Trap Door Spiders, a Hurricane, and a second Walking Wall. These changes maintain the deck's overall effectiveness, although if Jon plays blue it will obviously be slightly weaker. In fact, the six changed cards make the deck tighter overall. Testing the Plan B deck revealed that the changes give it a bit more focus and effectiveness in combat.
* = from a previous set
Back to Deckmasters 2001