| Prophecy Prerelease-Houston, TX |
Doug Curry
After having been a part of so many of these events, I find it difficult
to report on it since it all seems so routine now. Perhaps that is simply
because I have so much experience with it now that nothing fazes me
anymore.
Registration opened around 9:00 AM and around 11:30 we started the
tournament. Since there were not going to be two flights, we waited to
allow more people to arrive. As usual, there were several people who
entered the tournament late and required a re-pairing of round 1, but
since the software took care of it easily and the first set of pairings
were never posted, this was not a big issue. Sometimes, when a single
late entry arrives all you need do is pair that person with the bye, or
give them a bye for the first round. Unfortunately, our latest entries
were two guys from Panama who made the trip to Houston specifically to
attend our tournament. But since we had held off on posting the pairings
until after deck construction, there was no problem with deleting the
current pairings and creating new ones.
Unlike the past several prerelease tournaments (PRTs) we have held in
Houston, flights of 100 were not used. We didn't really have any more or
less people show up than the past couple of PRTs, but instead of having
one flight that was 100 or so people and another with only 50-60 people,
there was a single tournament of around 150 people.
This was better in several ways for the number of people we had attending.
Firstly, it provided a more competitive tournament than two smaller
tournaments would have been able to provide. Secondly, there was no
complaint of too small a prize because the full number of participants to
support the prize had not been reached. This was a concern in the past
because a tournament flight of only 50 would only garner one-half the
prize that a full flight of 100 would. With a single event, that was
eliminated. Thirdly, for the Staff, especially the head scorekeeper (me),
running only a single flight meant no switching back and forth between two
open windows on the computer and trying to keep straight two different
tournaments running concurrently.
While after a few times it became fairly routine to run two tournaments,
it was never easy. Some of the issues involved with running two
tournaments simultaneously are that you really need to stagger the round
start times. That way while one tournament is coming to the end of a
round and the scorekeeper is trying frantically to enter the results
correctly and in a timely manner, the second tournament needs to be about
halfway through a round. That way they don't need data entry, new
pairings made and printed, standings printed, results entry slips printed,
etc. at the same time as the other tournament.
Another new thing that was done at this event was that side events started
before the main tournament while people were waiting for the main
tournament to begin. While this led to more than one pre-first round
drop, that was not the fault of the TO or the judges. People drop from
prerelease tournaments all the time to play in side events.
With more people, we had to play one additional round, but that did not
add significant time to the tournament. The main event ran generally
smoothly even though we had some novice judges helping out. The time of
the tournament was approximately 14 hours from beginning of registration
to awarding of prizes. A breakdown of the time spent on each of the
various activities in the tournament:
- Player Registration: 2.5 hours (about 45 minutes were spent waiting for
more entries to arrive)
- Deck Registration: .5 hours
- Deck Construction: .5 hours
- Play of the rounds: 10.5 hours for 8 rounds
- Mean Round time: Approx. 69 minutes
There was one incident that might be worth mentioning. After the new
pairings for a round were posted, two players complained that their points
were incorrect. Both players confirmed that the results from the last
round when they had played each other were incorrectly entered. I always
keep the results entry slips until the end of the tournament for just such
an occurrence. I consulted the results slip for their match and confirmed
that I had in fact entered the result correctly according to the slip, and
that the problem was that they had reported the result incorrectly on the
slip. The Head Judge said to simply correct the score, fix the pairings
so that they would play each other's opponents (fortunately, this was only
the 2nd round) and drive on.
|