| Mercadian Masques Prerelease-Minneapolis, MN |
James Hamblin
This was my first experience head-judging a major event, and my second
prerelease event. We had 216 players in the main event, a modest turnout,
which were divided into two pods. Approximately 30 side tournaments,
mainly booster drafts, were also run. I was mainly in charge of the
120-person pod, and Marc Aquino (Level 2) was in charge of the 96-person
pod. As the head judge, I was occasionally called over to settle a dispute
in his pod, but for the most part, it ran very smoothly.
At the beginning of the day, when the players were registering their cards,
I should have been more insistent in getting them to stop reading their
cards. Certainly, at an event like this, players want to (and should be
allowed to) learn about these new cards, but some players didn't start
recording their cards until very late, which caused a large delay. While a
certain amount of miscommunication and inexperience is expected of the
players at a prerelease event, 2 or 3 players held up the entire process.
Once we got the ball rolling, there were few problems. We were slightly
overstaffed on judging, and many of the judges were inexperienced, but I
made every effort to resolve problems quickly and fairly. For example, the
judge taking decklists and distributing extra land did not know he was
supposed to make sure that players had written their name on the
list. Fortunately, this was caught after only a couple of decklists had
been submitted, and we managed to find those people.
Surprisingly, the rules questions and judge calls were not as frequent as I
expected them to be. Since the Destiny prerelease was under 5th edition
rules, this was many players' first exposure to the new rules
set. However, if anything, players I encountered were not uninformed about
the new rules, only misinformed. For example, one player insisted that he
could respond to a damage prevention effect by destroying the creature
generating it, thus cancelling the effect. His justification was some
nonsense about the stack, and he remained unconvinced by my explanations.
I was also unsure about how many times I would have to assert my role as
head judge, either to overrule a subordinate or to settle a dispute. This
actually happened rarely. The judges I was working with would often
approach me with questions about what to do, I would tell them, and they
would do it. In these situations, I did not have to intervene
personally. However, the few instances in which I did have to intervene
seemed to resolve easily, and I received no complaints during or after the
tournament.
Overall, I believe the event was a success. Thanks to Darrell Wyatt for
being there for me to bounce questions off of and for setting a great
example for me to follow. Thanks also to my judge staff, especially Marc
Aquino, Chris Anderson and Phil, whose last name I do not
remember. Special thanks to Steve and Marci Port, the TO's, for backing me
up and making my job easy.
--
James Hamblin
Level 2
Madison, WI
|