|
Rank
|
Player
|
Points
|
Op.Win%
|
| 32 |
Zhou, Yujian |
18 |
55.15% |
| 96 |
Zhong, Wei Wen * |
15 |
61.11% |
| 250 |
Zhang, Tian Hao * |
9 |
54.42% |
| 213 |
Zhang, Qun * |
10 |
61.90% |
| 68 |
Zen, Quentin * |
15 |
71.42% |
| 170 |
Zee, Way Leong |
12 |
55.61% |
| 229 |
Yung, Yung * |
10 |
40.13% |
| 4 |
Yuliadinata, Dennis |
21 |
68.57% |
| 38 |
Yuen, Kwan Ching |
16 |
79.76% |
| 195 |
Yu, Zhaowei * |
12 |
47.61% |
| 179 |
Yu, Mingyi * |
12 |
54.42% |
| 126 |
Yoo, Ki Hyun * |
13 |
69.04% |
| 265 |
Yong, Woei * |
9 |
47.95% |
| 146 |
Yong Keat, Lee * |
12 |
69.04% |
| 13 |
Yeung, Sin Kit * |
18 |
78.57% |
| 286 |
Yeo, Melvin * |
8 |
53.70% |
| 156 |
Yeo, Lee Chye * |
12 |
60.71% |
| 112 |
Yeh, Chao Lung |
15 |
47.61% |
| 274 |
Yee, Chin Keng * |
9 |
44.21% |
| 76 |
Yasooka, Shouta |
15 |
68.57% |
| 283 |
Yap, Marcus * |
9 |
40.81% |
| 49 |
Yap, Jing Yang |
16 |
62.03% |
| 55 |
Yap, Jason Kok Sang * |
16 |
53.74% |
| 218 |
Yang, Joshua |
10 |
55.32% |
| 14 |
Yamada, Tsutomu |
18 |
76.19% |
| 153 |
xu, su |
12 |
64.28% |
| 244 |
Xiao, Dennis Ting Bin * |
9 |
56.12% |
| 287 |
Wu, Yang San * |
8 |
45.37% |
| 254 |
Wu, Sebestian * |
9 |
53.40% |
| 284 |
Wu, JunYu * |
9 |
39.45% |
| 309 |
Woo, Chung Leong Jason * |
6 |
55.78% |
| 39 |
Woo, Benjamin Lik Kang * |
16 |
75.23% |
| 183 |
Wong, Samson |
12 |
52.72% |
| 212 |
Wong, Nicholas Jonathan |
10 |
62.03% |
| 281 |
Wong, Ming Fook * |
9 |
41.95% |
| 113 |
Wong, Lucas * |
15 |
43.87% |
| 308 |
Wong, Jeff * |
6 |
57.33% |
| 267 |
Wong, Hon Choon * |
9 |
47.40% |
| 142 |
Wong, Freddy Chun Sung * |
12 |
73.21% |
| 225 |
Wong, Choon Hong Ronald * |
10 |
48.97% |
| 104 |
Wong, Chi Ming * |
15 |
55.78% |
| 189 |
Wong Pu Siong, Alex * |
12 |
49.93% |
| 339 |
Widjaja, Rudy |
4 |
58.33% |
| 365 |
Weng, Rong Can * |
1 |
42.66% |
| 235 |
Watabe, Naoto * |
9 |
66.66% |
| 232 |
Wang, Tian |
9 |
71.11% |
| 210 |
Wang, Sim Loong |
11 |
51.11% |
| 134 |
Vogin, Willy * |
13 |
55.15% |
| 93 |
Vasu, Vivian |
15 |
62.50% |
| 227 |
Uttisen, Patwikorn * |
10 |
47.61% |
| 51 |
Tung, Chang-Ming |
16 |
60.71% |
| 79 |
Tsumura, Kenji |
15 |
67.85% |
| 324 |
Tse, Desmond * |
6 |
46.98% |
| 131 |
Tsai, Ming Da |
13 |
61.90% |
| 299 |
Toy, WenDa * |
7 |
40.92% |
| 319 |
Torres, Danielle Paul * |
6 |
49.65% |
| 188 |
Tong, Jing Yao * |
12 |
50.34% |
| 223 |
Toh, woon Seong * |
10 |
49.65% |
| 336 |
Toh, Qing Yao * |
6 |
37.95% |
| 305 |
Tjandra, Miki * |
6 |
62.58% |
| 338 |
Tiong, Joe * |
5 |
42.66% |
| 152 |
Thio, Russell |
12 |
64.28% |
| 159 |
Teo, Yi Chiang |
12 |
59.04% |
| 241 |
Teo, kaiwen * |
9 |
57.40% |
| 199 |
Teo, Justin * |
12 |
43.53% |
| 297 |
Teo, Chun Min * |
7 |
42.17% |
| 182 |
Teo, Boon Peng * |
12 |
53.06% |
| 62 |
Teeradechsakul, Teerachai |
15 |
75.00% |
| 161 |
Tay, Yong Wei Ralph * |
12 |
58.43% |
| 160 |
Tay, Yi Lu * |
12 |
58.50% |
| 186 |
tan, xingyong * |
12 |
51.19% |
| 292 |
Tan, Wei Sau Johnathan * |
7 |
48.97% |
| 361 |
Tan, Wee Meng * |
3 |
39.72% |
| 352 |
Tan, Wee Cher * |
3 |
49.20% |
| 333 |
Tan, Wee Cheng * |
6 |
41.49% |
| 313 |
Tan, Victor * |
6 |
52.77% |
| 97 |
Tan, Steven |
15 |
60.71% |
| 59 |
Tan, Steve Wei Quan |
15 |
77.14% |
| 347 |
Tan, Kiat Cheong * |
3 |
58.33% |
| 371 |
Tan, Keng Wee Samuel * |
0 |
41.66% |
| 322 |
Tan, Kek Chin * |
6 |
48.41% |
| 329 |
Tan, Kah Wei * |
6 |
45.57% |
| 355 |
Tan, Kah Beng * |
3 |
45.37% |
| 373 |
Tan, Jinn Yeong Kelvin * |
0 |
36.05% |
| 174 |
Tan, Jasper Ming Yuan * |
12 |
54.76% |
| 271 |
Tan, Han Nygel * |
9 |
45.57% |
| 311 |
Tan, Han Lin * |
6 |
53.33% |
| 100 |
tan, gary Gui Ping |
15 |
57.93% |
| 342 |
Tan, Eng Giap * |
4 |
43.87% |
| 238 |
Tan, David Boon Leong * |
9 |
59.25% |
| 47 |
Tan, Chuen Hwa |
16 |
65.07% |
| 181 |
Tan, Chin Heng * |
12 |
53.06% |
| 340 |
Tan, Chee Chong * |
4 |
45.37% |
| 2 |
Tamber, Tobey |
21 |
74.60% |
| 18 |
Takeshita, Tooru |
18 |
75.00% |
| 21 |
Takeda, Hiroki * |
18 |
70.95% |
| 65 |
Suwansunthorn, Pluet * |
15 |
71.90% |
| 197 |
Sutthisakorn, Channarong * |
12 |
46.25% |
| 337 |
Sutanto, Hendrew * |
6 |
37.00% |
| 143 |
Sundarakalin, Punthorn * |
12 |
72.61% |
| 139 |
Sun, Jiafeng * |
13 |
44.21% |
| 109 |
Subari, Anthony * |
15 |
50.00% |
| 99 |
Su, Michael * |
15 |
58.84% |
| 264 |
su, Jee-hung * |
9 |
48.29% |
| 206 |
Starrs, Sean * |
11 |
58.16% |
| 302 |
Soon, Kenny * |
7 |
39.90% |
| 304 |
Soon Kuan, Saw |
6 |
66.66% |
| 119 |
Song, Hua chao |
13 |
74.28% |
| 164 |
Soh, Weng Heng |
12 |
57.53% |
| 46 |
Soh, Terry |
16 |
65.47% |
| 11 |
Soh, Joe |
18 |
79.76% |
| 200 |
Soh, Chia Xiong * |
12 |
43.19% |
| 273 |
Sng, Kim Guan * |
9 |
44.48% |
| 77 |
Sirilertvorakul, Veerapat |
15 |
68.25% |
| 83 |
Sim, Wee Yi * |
15 |
67.14% |
| 202 |
Sim, Chun Hung Anthony * |
12 |
42.17% |
| 293 |
Siagian, Yohannes |
7 |
45.23% |
| 44 |
Shiozu, Ryouma |
16 |
66.66% |
| 26 |
Shimura, Ichirou |
18 |
64.28% |
| 135 |
Shimoji, Ai |
13 |
54.53% |
| 307 |
Seow, Chun Jie * |
6 |
57.40% |
| 226 |
Schuette, Soeren * |
10 |
48.14% |
| 24 |
Sasagawa, Tomohide |
18 |
66.66% |
| 27 |
Salvin, Jean Charles |
18 |
63.88% |
| 367 |
Salleh, Fuad * |
0 |
100.00% |
| 48 |
Saito, Tomoharu |
16 |
63.80% |
| 256 |
Ryo, Takada * |
9 |
52.72% |
| 260 |
Rosmarudin, Md Faizal Bin * |
9 |
49.25% |
| 351 |
Riphat, Aziz * |
3 |
50.00% |
| 350 |
Rangsan, Janrangsee * |
3 |
53.33% |
| 288 |
Puri, Karan * |
8 |
44.44% |
| 185 |
Punpuing, Paopun * |
12 |
52.06% |
| 216 |
Potter, Michael * |
10 |
57.40% |
| 140 |
ponlasint, suntee * |
12 |
83.33% |
| 171 |
Pong, Robin Hee Tee |
12 |
55.55% |
| 266 |
Poh, Ming Jie Audric * |
9 |
47.61% |
| 215 |
Piamrasri, Chomron * |
10 |
58.16% |
| 253 |
Phungprachit, Pulperm * |
9 |
53.67% |
| 60 |
Phanpakorn, Dolpipop * |
15 |
76.19% |
| 10 |
Phang, Kok Fai * |
18 |
82.14% |
| 345 |
Pek, Dennis Sik Haam * |
3 |
62.50% |
| 73 |
Pek, Cheng Wee |
15 |
69.52% |
| 138 |
Pang, Kelvin Goo Xiang |
13 |
47.05% |
| 198 |
pang, edwin Tian Xiang * |
12 |
45.80% |
| 118 |
pak, matthew * |
13 |
75.00% |
| 120 |
Osawa, Takuya |
13 |
73.33% |
| 211 |
Orsuwan, Sutthisak * |
11 |
45.50% |
| 369 |
Ooi, Wei Jie Andrew * |
0 |
44.44% |
| 98 |
Ong, Weiwah * |
15 |
60.31% |
| 314 |
Ong, Wei Kuan * |
6 |
51.36% |
| 279 |
Ong, Wei Bin * |
9 |
42.72% |
| 66 |
Ong, Kok Seng |
15 |
71.42% |
| 162 |
Ong, Desmond Wei Liang * |
12 |
58.16% |
| 19 |
Oks, Oliver |
18 |
71.42% |
| 321 |
Okada, Kou |
6 |
49.33% |
| 74 |
Oiso, Masashi |
15 |
69.04% |
| 71 |
Ogura, Ryou |
15 |
69.64% |
| 298 |
Nyew, Yee Leong * |
7 |
41.33% |
| 36 |
Noel, Neo Yong Ling Amrith * |
17 |
71.03% |
| 8 |
Nishino, Kenta |
19 |
65.07% |
| 116 |
Ng, Wei San |
14 |
62.69% |
| 346 |
Ng, Wei Lee |
3 |
60.41% |
| 294 |
Ng, Wai Kwong Victor * |
7 |
44.55% |
| 92 |
Ng, Soon Lye |
15 |
62.69% |
| 204 |
Ng, Kay Wee * |
12 |
34.69% |
| 70 |
Ng, Kay Seong * |
15 |
69.84% |
| 190 |
Ng, Jun Yuan * |
12 |
49.60% |
| 247 |
Ng, Gene Jian Jie * |
9 |
55.10% |
| 129 |
Ng, Eric Jun Feng * |
13 |
65.30% |
| 52 |
Ng, Chong Leng * |
16 |
57.93% |
| 280 |
Ng, Chin Pin * |
9 |
42.44% |
| 263 |
Ng, bob Yeong Siang * |
9 |
48.29% |
| 224 |
Ng, Benson * |
10 |
49.43% |
| 354 |
New, Chee Wee * |
3 |
45.83% |
| 344 |
Neo, Wee Kang Daniel * |
4 |
40.81% |
| 262 |
Neo, Jarred Chye Heng * |
9 |
48.75% |
| 268 |
Neo, Hong Zhi * |
9 |
47.39% |
| 259 |
Neo, Benjamin * |
9 |
50.00% |
| 285 |
Neo, Alvin Wee Kian * |
9 |
39.04% |
| 151 |
Nakamura, Shuuhei |
12 |
64.28% |
| 64 |
Mun Yip, Yau |
15 |
73.21% |
| 94 |
Morita, Masahiko |
15 |
61.90% |
| 37 |
Mori, Katsuhiro |
17 |
66.66% |
| 349 |
Mogi, Ray * |
3 |
58.33% |
| 41 |
Mitsuya, Kazuhiko |
16 |
72.61% |
| 115 |
Matousek, Pavel |
14 |
66.66% |
| 54 |
masaya, Kitayama * |
16 |
55.71% |
| 50 |
maneechareonwong, prapon |
16 |
61.90% |
| 56 |
Lu, Shufeng * |
16 |
51.02% |
| 291 |
Low, Kah Yuan * |
7 |
49.65% |
| 290 |
Loo, Ching Siong * |
7 |
50.00% |
| 242 |
Loh, Wei Wen * |
9 |
56.66% |
| 177 |
Loh, Ryan * |
12 |
54.42% |
| 33 |
Loh, Mun Kit * |
18 |
54.08% |
| 228 |
Loh, Martin * |
10 |
47.27% |
| 245 |
Loh, Chuan Han |
9 |
56.08% |
| 80 |
Liu, Yi-liu |
15 |
67.85% |
| 296 |
Lin, Yi Chao * |
7 |
42.63% |
| 368 |
Lin, WeiDe * |
0 |
55.55% |
| 155 |
Lin, Ruizi * |
12 |
61.22% |
| 372 |
Lin, Rui Feng * |
0 |
41.66% |
| 5 |
lin, mingyi * |
21 |
64.62% |
| 205 |
Lin, Ming Shian * |
11 |
65.07% |
| 67 |
Lin, Milton Jian Xiong |
15 |
71.42% |
| 102 |
Lim, Yong Hui Ivan |
15 |
56.66% |
| 111 |
Lim, Tzer Chern * |
15 |
49.25% |
| 157 |
Lim, Tae-hyun * |
12 |
59.75% |
| 221 |
Lim, Swee Weng * |
10 |
50.45% |
| 222 |
Lim, Sidney Ming Han Reube * |
10 |
50.18% |
| 272 |
Lim, Shi Cheng James * |
9 |
45.37% |
| 261 |
Lim, Leslie * |
9 |
48.97% |
| 258 |
Lim, Ke You * |
9 |
52.38% |
| 270 |
Lim, Jun Guang Wilfred * |
9 |
46.53% |
| 172 |
Lim, Guan Ling David * |
12 |
55.37% |
| 108 |
Lim, Ernest |
15 |
50.39% |
| 114 |
Lim, Chen Foong * |
14 |
69.04% |
| 353 |
Liew, Gabriel Wei Sheng * |
3 |
47.22% |
| 148 |
Li, Jie |
12 |
66.66% |
| 325 |
Li, HongZeng Kelvin * |
6 |
46.66% |
| 147 |
li, fabien Yi * |
12 |
67.00% |
| 348 |
Li, chi lung * |
3 |
58.33% |
| 231 |
Li, Cheuk Yin * |
9 |
72.22% |
| 149 |
Leong, Joseph Kin Seng * |
12 |
64.96% |
| 29 |
Leong, Felix |
18 |
62.58% |
| 88 |
Leong, Ding Yuan |
15 |
64.28% |
| 16 |
Lee, Wen Yi * |
18 |
75.00% |
| 187 |
lee, timothy * |
12 |
50.68% |
| 121 |
Lee, Sang-ryeol |
13 |
71.42% |
| 53 |
Lee, Keng Yin * |
16 |
57.82% |
| 25 |
Lee, Ju-Min * |
18 |
64.62% |
| 165 |
Lee, Jin Hui Edmund * |
12 |
57.41% |
| 192 |
Lee, Jason Lay Boon |
12 |
48.29% |
| 364 |
Lee, Guan Heng * |
1 |
47.91% |
| 91 |
Law, Charles Chang Teck |
15 |
62.69% |
| 20 |
Law, Albertus |
18 |
71.42% |
| 82 |
Lau, Zhao Zhi * |
15 |
67.34% |
| 150 |
Lau, Wilfred * |
12 |
64.89% |
| 145 |
Lau, Sam Lei Kang |
12 |
69.52% |
| 6 |
Lam, Joe Cho Yiu * |
19 |
76.19% |
| 217 |
Lam, chi kwong * |
10 |
56.46% |
| 331 |
Lai, Yong Sheng * |
6 |
43.53% |
| 255 |
Kwek, Alfie * |
9 |
52.77% |
| 237 |
Kwan, David Wei Phang |
9 |
59.25% |
| 12 |
Kuo, Tzu Ching |
18 |
78.57% |
| 323 |
Kuek, Hong Feng Adrian * |
6 |
48.29% |
| 22 |
Kuan, Khang Jong |
18 |
69.04% |
| 31 |
Krish, Rondy * |
18 |
60.95% |
| 239 |
Koo, Andy * |
9 |
59.18% |
| 124 |
Kong, Yeunjin * |
13 |
70.23% |
| 9 |
Kong, Chong Teng * |
19 |
58.50% |
| 42 |
Komuro, Shuu |
16 |
69.04% |
| 180 |
Kok, Kim Yin |
12 |
53.70% |
| 257 |
Koh, Zhi-Ti Jason * |
9 |
52.65% |
| 275 |
Koh, Shao Hong * |
9 |
43.58% |
| 75 |
Koh, Matthew Hong En * |
15 |
68.78% |
| 203 |
Koh, Chong Yew Edwin * |
12 |
41.49% |
| 69 |
Kiwanont, Sukhum |
15 |
70.47% |
| 207 |
Kiu, Si Wei Desmond * |
11 |
57.59% |
| 86 |
Kim, Min Soo |
15 |
65.47% |
| 332 |
Kim, Cynic * |
6 |
43.51% |
| 141 |
Khoo, Aik Seng |
12 |
75.00% |
| 362 |
Kee, Zhen Hui * |
3 |
38.88% |
| 17 |
Kataoka, Asami * |
18 |
75.00% |
| 318 |
Kang, Wei Xiong * |
6 |
50.00% |
| 34 |
Kang, Gabriel * |
18 |
54.08% |
| 63 |
Kaji, Tomohiro |
15 |
75.00% |
| 117 |
Jirapongtrakul, Boonchai |
13 |
76.19% |
| 122 |
Jiang, Yixiang |
13 |
70.74% |
| 234 |
Jen, Chien-Ming |
9 |
67.85% |
| 123 |
Iskandar, Nik * |
13 |
70.23% |
| 3 |
Ishida, Itaru |
21 |
71.42% |
| 125 |
Imai, Kimio |
13 |
69.52% |
| 106 |
Ibamoto, Masami |
15 |
52.38% |
| 35 |
Hwang, Chi-Chung |
17 |
73.80% |
| 209 |
Hung, Hsun Hao * |
11 |
53.96% |
| 85 |
Hung, Chi Hang * |
15 |
66.07% |
| 28 |
Huang, Stephen Wen Liang * |
18 |
63.09% |
| 317 |
Huang, Spencer * |
6 |
50.66% |
| 173 |
Huang, Benjamin |
12 |
55.23% |
| 360 |
Hon, Chun Wah * |
3 |
39.79% |
| 248 |
Ho, Yong Jian * |
9 |
54.81% |
| 312 |
Ho, Ming Gen * |
6 |
52.96% |
| 144 |
Ho, Maximilian * |
12 |
71.42% |
| 252 |
Hiu, Choon Pien * |
9 |
53.74% |
| 194 |
Hio, Man Tung Lester * |
12 |
47.95% |
| 278 |
Hendriks Franssen, Sven * |
9 |
42.85% |
| 101 |
Hendrawan, Bernhard * |
15 |
56.74% |
| 326 |
Hartanto, Victor * |
6 |
46.66% |
| 230 |
Hao, Feng * |
10 |
38.77% |
| 166 |
Gwee, Hong Kiat Kenneth * |
12 |
57.14% |
| 107 |
Götz, Patrick * |
15 |
51.90% |
| 128 |
Gong, Di Hui |
13 |
65.47% |
| 320 |
Goh, Yong Xin * |
6 |
49.33% |
| 370 |
Goh, Wu Chong * |
0 |
42.66% |
| 363 |
Goh, Wee Teck Jerry * |
3 |
37.50% |
| 158 |
Goh, Sean Luke * |
12 |
59.18% |
| 359 |
Goh, Kian Hou Gerald * |
3 |
40.00% |
| 132 |
Goh, Kenneth Han Ming * |
13 |
60.54% |
| 133 |
Goh, Johnson * |
13 |
59.63% |
| 208 |
Goh, Chris Si Wei * |
11 |
55.78% |
| 1 |
Gao, Zhen Xing |
21 |
77.38% |
| 127 |
Gan, vincent Wai Kuan |
13 |
66.66% |
| 310 |
gan, meng san * |
6 |
54.16% |
| 269 |
Gan, Jonathan Zheng Sheng * |
9 |
47.22% |
| 169 |
Gan, Huai Shi * |
12 |
55.78% |
| 214 |
Gan, Chun Fung * |
10 |
58.88% |
| 233 |
Gaku, Hasegawa * |
9 |
67.85% |
| 87 |
Fujita, Tsuyoshi |
15 |
65.47% |
| 78 |
Fujita, Osamu |
15 |
67.85% |
| 277 |
Foong, WenJun * |
9 |
42.85% |
| 57 |
fong, clement yu Mun * |
16 |
47.27% |
| 315 |
Fan, Kah Ping Nelson * |
6 |
50.92% |
| 110 |
Eurkittiroj, Arthit * |
15 |
50.00% |
| 130 |
Eng, Sam Ching Seng * |
13 |
63.88% |
| 191 |
Eng, Boon Tat Elvin |
12 |
48.41% |
| 303 |
Emuang, Bradley Keith * |
7 |
37.96% |
| 103 |
Eide, Sterling Ellis * |
15 |
56.39% |
| 316 |
Effendi, Yopi |
6 |
50.66% |
| 343 |
Dwiputra, Arifirawan * |
4 |
41.33% |
| 178 |
Dayag, Henry * |
12 |
54.42% |
| 236 |
Chung, Villien Yaw Fui * |
9 |
61.90% |
| 184 |
Chung, Ian Wai Ming * |
12 |
52.38% |
| 89 |
Chun, Bo Ruad |
15 |
63.88% |
| 72 |
Chua, Wei xiang * |
15 |
69.64% |
| 276 |
Chua, Rodger Meng Wan * |
9 |
43.53% |
| 249 |
Chua, David |
9 |
54.44% |
| 45 |
Chua, Chang |
16 |
65.47% |
| 243 |
Chua, Boon Kiat James * |
9 |
56.46% |
| 58 |
choo, yong han * |
15 |
80.00% |
| 327 |
Chong, Yu Terng Aidrich * |
6 |
46.25% |
| 196 |
Chong, Yi Da * |
12 |
47.61% |
| 282 |
Chong, Qi Da * |
9 |
41.76% |
| 163 |
Chong, Fong Kai * |
12 |
58.16% |
| 334 |
Chong, David Tian Wei * |
6 |
39.45% |
| 358 |
Chong, Daniel Tian Nian * |
3 |
41.83% |
| 335 |
Cho, Zheng Heng * |
6 |
39.04% |
| 168 |
Ching, Yu Jun Jonathan * |
12 |
56.46% |
| 246 |
Ching, Jian Hong * |
9 |
56.05% |
| 251 |
Ching, Chao Chyvn Charles * |
9 |
54.42% |
| 240 |
chia, edmund * |
9 |
58.33% |
| 167 |
Chia, Bing Hong * |
12 |
56.73% |
| 220 |
Cher, Chin Wee |
10 |
54.62% |
| 295 |
cheong, Kevin * |
7 |
44.55% |
| 356 |
Chen, Yun Xiang * |
3 |
44.55% |
| 219 |
Chen, Yenh-Hau |
10 |
55.15% |
| 300 |
Chen, SiHao * |
7 |
40.81% |
| 301 |
Chen, Quan Sheng * |
7 |
40.47% |
| 84 |
Chang, Yu-Jen |
15 |
66.66% |
| 61 |
Chang, Chih-Hsiang |
15 |
75.00% |
| 137 |
Chandra, Edy * |
13 |
48.07% |
| 175 |
Chan, ZhongHan Jonathan * |
12 |
54.73% |
| 330 |
Chan, Zhi Hung * |
6 |
45.17% |
| 193 |
Chan, Weng Cheong Samuel * |
12 |
47.95% |
| 15 |
Chan, Shih Chien |
18 |
75.00% |
| 154 |
Chan, Qin Liang * |
12 |
62.92% |
| 306 |
Chan, Boon Hao * |
6 |
58.33% |
| 105 |
Chan, Bernard Hock Keong |
15 |
53.80% |
| 201 |
Chai, Minji * |
12 |
42.85% |
| 40 |
Chai, Ming Huang Royce |
16 |
73.33% |
| 289 |
Chai, Eng Chye * |
7 |
52.49% |
| 95 |
Cai, ShaoKen * |
15 |
61.67% |
| 328 |
Bay, Ee Yong Dennis * |
6 |
45.85% |
| 366 |
Bai, Yixiang * |
1 |
37.50% |
| 90 |
Bai, Mingzhi * |
15 |
63.26% |
| 81 |
Azuma, Motokiyo |
15 |
67.46% |
| 43 |
Au Yong, Wai Kin |
16 |
67.85% |
| 23 |
Asahara, Akira |
18 |
67.85% |
| 7 |
Arita, Ryuuichi |
19 |
71.42% |
| 136 |
Ang, Wei Tiong * |
13 |
51.11% |
| 30 |
Ang, Junyang |
18 |
61.90% |
| 357 |
Ang, Joo Chuan Jilson * |
3 |
44.00% |
| 341 |
Ang, Dun Jiu * |
4 |
44.44% |
| 176 |
Ahmad, Jufri * |
12 |
54.69% |