Feature

The forgotten deck type that's all about the fatties.

The Midrange Archetype

  • Boards
  • Print
Author Image

Greetings! I'm Kenneth Nagle and I've been working in R&D about two months ago after participating in The Great Designer Search. I want to address something that's been bugging me for quite a while now. Magic theorists, deckbuilders, and writers seem to know it, but they can't put it into words. They understand it without really understanding it. They think about it without really thinking about it. Do you know what I'm talking about?

Hunting_WildsWhat I'm talking about extends from the aggro, control, and combo trifecta that Magic players have known, talked, and written about for years. We know that aggro swarms you with fast damage, control reacts and disables opposing threats with answers, and combo seeks to assemble a gigantic game-winning spell or sequence of spells.

One extension is the hybrid archetype aggro-control, which borrows the creature element from aggro and the disruption element from control. This is another well-studied archetype that follows a 'deploy and protect' plan.

But I feel there's another archetype that lots of players are missing. It's an archetype that also borrows some creature elements from aggro and some disruption elements from control, but in a different way. While it's been called many things over the years, the term most in use by the Magic populace is midrange – that's what we will call it today and hopefully everyday hereafter.

On the Origin of Midrange

Ever since Magic players first started playing creatures and attacking, their opponents have been, well, playing creatures and blocking. Creatures die, more creatures are summoned, and war wages on. The dust clears and one player wins.

One thing that players learn quickly in our game is that large creatures, which we colloquially call 'fatties', win when they fight with smaller creatures called 'weenies'.

Fatties are significantly better in the aggro vs. aggro matchup than elsewhere. The creatures or 'threats' in both aggro decks normally cancel each other out, and games often come down to a topdecking war. One player draws additional threats while the other player draws lands that he can't use effectively. Many players will sideboard out weenies and sideboard in fatties in this matchup to better utilize their excess lands and outclass the opponent's smaller creatures.

Bogardan_Hellkite Akroma_Angel_of_Wrath

In fact, it's my experience that fatties are at their very best when their mere presence invalidates one or more enemy creatures already on the table. Attacking with Akroma, Angel of Wrath is awesome, but it's even more awesome when your opponent can't attack back with their Bogardan Hellkite afterward.

One fateful day, an aggro deck kept its fatties in and dropped the remainder of its small attacking force. It shored up its holes with things like mana acceleration, stalwart defense, and maybe even a reset button or two. It became a midrange deck!

Now is a good time for a decklist. To show that I'm not just making all this up, I'll cite historic precedent from some of the game's most successful deckbuilders.

William Jensen
Green-White Vegetation

William Jensen's Onslaught Block Constructed deck is a very straightforward midrange deck. Let's break the deck down into components.

The Components of Midrange

In essence, Midrange is the strategy of playing fatties and the means to make them most effective. They share many attributes in common.

Fatties

Aw, the reason to play the midrange! These threats are what the archetype is trying to maximize. You can't play a midrange deck without excellent fatties! Green-White Vegetation sports an impressive fatty suite in Ravenous Baloth, Silvos, Exalted Angel, and Akroma, Angel of Wrath.

High Curves

Midrange decks sport relatively high mana curves. They contain spells for the early game that lead into cards included for the midgame. There's also relatively good incentive to play 'scaling' cards like Fireball that get better and better as the game progresses. Green-White Vegetation sports a staggered mana curve all the way to eight, with the most impressive plays happening on two mana, four mana, six mana, and finally eight mana for Akroma.

Lots of Mana

Because of their high curves, midrange decks must reserve a healthy amount of deck slots to mana to effectively play their spells. You'll often find mana acceleration and mana sinks that somehow make effective use of all the spare mana midrange decks have lying around. Green-White Vegetation sports 4 Wirewood Elf to jump from two mana to four mana and 4 Explosive Vegetation to jump from four mana to six or seven or mana, bringing the deck to 34 dedicated mana sources! The eight cycling lands are great turn-one land drops with almost no drawback, cheaply cycling away in the later turns to dig out of a manaflood to look for more gas.

Defense

Midrange decks normally find one way or another to defend themselves, especially against aggro decks. Here you'll often find dedicated board control elements not unlike what you'd expect in a control deck. Green-White Vegetation sports Wall of Mulch and Windborn Muse in addition to a full reset button in quadruple Akroma's Vengeance. We even see metagame utility man Daru Sanctifier as a preemptive answer to Astral Slide and Lightning Rift, the premiere Control deck at the time and presumably a bad matchup for Green-White Vegetation.

That's a good enough definition to get us through the rest of our discussion today. Let's continue with something a bit more theoretical. I'm going to describe three different strategies that midrange decks can execute, providing multiple decklists per strategy.

Midrange Strategies

Siege Wurm
Siege Wurm encapsulates the Acceleration Midrange strategy in a single card package.

Acceleration: Midrange-Combo

One midrange strategy is to quickly accelerate mana or otherwise cheat a huge threatening fatty into play. Large creatures need to attack, and if you can get a large creature into play earlier, logic follows that you'll get additional attacks in, which equals more damage, which equals deader opponents.

When taken to an extreme, this strategy can resemble or turn into a combo deck:

Kenji's Tsumura's Pro Tour – Philadelphia deck has fierce acceleration, completely skipping over the usual fatties of Kokusho, Yosei, or Keiga and instead dropping a godlike, game-winning Myojin.

Kai Budde's deck begins with 4 Birds of Paradise, 4 Sakura-Tribe Elder, and 4 Kodama's Reach to ramp and hit all the colors just before raining down massive bombs upon his opponent's head, including my personal favorite card from Mirrodin block – Etched Oracle. Bringer of the Black Dawn comes prepackaged with its own mana-cheating clause for a potential turn-three play thanks to all of Kai's rainbow acceleration.

Hattori Hanzo Tron – Werner Cloete
2005 Worlds: 6-0 Standard Day One

Most Urzatron decks are midrange decks full of bombastic cards. Both Remand and Repeal are tempo cards that temporarily slow down the opponent, while Mana Leak and Spell Snare gain additional tempo in the early game. Once the Urzatron is assembled, the deck goes nuts with gigantic spells that outclass anything the opponent can possibly do.

Secret Force
Jamie Wakefield

Main Deck

60 cards

16  Forests
Gaea's Cradle
Wastelands

22 lands

Elvish Lyrist
Fyndhorn Elves
Llanowar Elves
Spike Feeder
Spike Weaver
Uktabi Orangutan
Verdant Force
Wall of Roots

27 creatures

Creeping Mold
Natural Order
Overrun

11 other spells


Secret Force is a midrange deck that's notorious for bringing in a turn-three Verdant Force through Natural Order, an absurdly powerful play against an aggro deck. Even without its namesake in play, all those wimpy Elves and utility creatures look innocent enough until Overrun does exactly what its name implies.

This is my dragon deck that I love very much, capable of 21/21 hasty Kilnmouth Dragons as long as you're not already dead by then. Beware: Dragons are the slowest tribe in Magic

Attrition

Midrange-Control

Kokusho_the_Evening_Star Yosei_the_Morning_Star

Many creatures in a midrange deck are potent enough to kill an opponent by themselves. One strategy a midrange deck can employ is to play just one large threat, then force the opponent to deal with that threat or die. Usually, the threat is either neutralized or matched in board presence. If the opponent committed lots of resources to the board, this becomes a great opportunity for the Midrange deck to equalize the table with a reset button such as Pernicious Deed or Akroma's Vengeance.

This strategy when executed correctly is one of the very best against aggro decks. The aggro player is constantly wrecked by the dilemma of attacking through a large blocker or being decimated by a reset button. In addition, a large creature can quickly finish off a crippled aggro player and prevent them from topdecking a lucky streak of threats or burn. Oftentimes control decks in tournaments will sideboard into this kind of strategy to have a better matchup against aggro decks.

This is an area where midrange blends into control. However, control is more likely to finish the opponent with what I call a perpetual threat – mana-intensive cards such as Firemane Angel, Eternal Dragon, Genesis, Urza's Factory, or Haakon, Stromgald Scourge. A midrange deck normally uses a reset for the tempo with the intention of coming out even or ahead.

The reset buttons midrange enjoys most are potentially asymmetrical ones like Pernicious Deed and Wildfire that are friendly toward large creatures. These cards can often be played proactively, leaving the opponent crippled and ripe for fatty beatdown. Sometimes, the creatures even have some kind of synergy with resetting the board, such as the Kamigawa Dragons.

Death Cloud is a reset button that favors commiting just one sizable threat to the table, in particular Kokusho, the Evening Star. Eternal Witness plays cleanup as a perpetual threat and all around Best Green Creature Ever Printed.

This is a midrange deck that plays 3 different reset buttons in Wave of Reckoning, Armageddon, and Serenity, and usually comes out way ahead on each of them. Many decks are seriously crippled by at least one of those three board-wrecking cards.

Curving: Midrange-Aggro

kavu_titan wurmcalling

This is an obscure Midrange strategy but let's explore it for the sake of completeness. Notice how Midrange decks tend to have high mana curves? Well, one can build a deck that concentrates solely on curving out one creature spell each turn for as long as possible. Creature spells that fit well in this kind of strategy include Kavu Titan and Wurmcalling, because they can fall into multiple places on the mana curve. Let's take a look at an ideal mana curve using the awesome green flashback cards from Odyssey:

Turn 1: Forest, Chatter of the Squirrel
Turn 2: Forest, Flashback Chatter of the Squirrel
Turn 3: Forest, Call of the Herd
Turn 4: Forest, Flashback Call of the Herd
Turn 5: Forest, Beast Attack
Turn 6: Forest, Flashback Beast Attack
Turn 7: Forest, Roar of the Wurm
Turn 8: Forest, Flashback Roar of the Wurm
Turn 9: Forest, Crush of Wurms (we're feeling ambitious!)

This sequence is interesting in that it plays a land and a threat every turn all the way to turn 9 while 'drawing' four additional cards, which is very impressive. An aggro deck that tries to attack through these green tokens is going to be in serious trouble. Likewise, a control deck that tries to contain creatures on a one-for-one basis using cards like Swords to Plowshares, Terror, Cancel, or burn is going to get mauled by relentless token green creatures. It takes three reset buttons to survive and barely break even on card advantage!

There are a couple reasons why this curving strategy typically doesn't work well, especially in tournament play:

  • Drawing the correct sequence of cards to curve out this high is very inconsistent.
  • 'Curve-friendly' creatures are usually not the most potent threats a deck could play for those mana costs. Troll Ascetic and Spectral Force are more potent than Call of the Herd and Beast Attack, but the token makers are more robust.

This curving strategy did exist at one time in an extremely powerful form when it was introduced in Mercadian Masques, known as the Rebel mechanic. Subpar two-drop creatures like Defiant Falcon and Amrou Scout give you the option of playing a three mana Rebel from your library as long as you're willing to pay four mana for the privilege. The Rebel lord Lin Sivvi lets you search for any Rebel and doesn't even charge a premium and has a recursion ability to boot. She was ultimately banned in Mercadian Masques Block Constructed!

Amrou_Scout Defiant_Falcon

Why Is Midrange Misunderstood?

I've often wondered why I should need to write an article like this in the first place. Why haven't we already embraced the midrange archetype for years now? Am I just wrong about this? I don't believe I'm entirely correct, but I'm pretty sure I'm not entirely incorrect, either.

In my experience, it's actually quite rare for professional Magic players to naturally adopt a hybrid archetype like aggro-control or midrange unless it's grossly overpowered and obvious to begin with. By contrast, I build midrange decks all the time. I have a couple theories about this, and they are just theories at that. I feel it's important to lay aside all our prejudices and look at why we see things the way we do.

Theory #1

Midrange decks throughout Magic's history are seldom competitive and 'look bad.'

Here's a list of some premier midrange cards that see lots of tournament and casual Constructed play:

These powerful cards that are some of the very best cards in the game at trumping decks that attack with small creatures. Flametongue Kavu is a supremely powerful red creature... as long as your opponent is playing creatures that die to 4 damage! Loxodon Hierarch is a reverse analogue, and there are only a handful of creatures in Magic that can outrace a naturally unmorphed Exalted Angel.

Many players know what The Rock means in Magic lingo – some green and black concoction with accelerators like Birds of Paradise and Sakura-Tribe Elder, monsters like Ravenous Baloth and Spiritmonger, disruption like Duress and Putrefy, and a board sweeper like Pernicious Deed or Death Cloud.

What you might not know unless you're a seasoned tournament player is that The Rock is a notoriously bad deck. It's a deck full of great cards that somehow can't win games.

Most midrange decks in Magic history look like 'utter piles' of 'bad cards.' Let's take a look again at the Hattori Hanzo Tron deck mentioned earlier:

Hattori Hanzo Tron – Werner Cloete
2005 Worlds: 6-0 Standard Day One

Werner Cloete piloted this deck to 6-0 on Day 1 of Worlds 2005, when Ravnica was legal but before Guildpact brought forth the blue-red staples of Steam Vents and Izzet Signet. This deck looked to the vast majority of tournament players like an utter pile of garbage. Who plays main-phase blue spells? Isn't tapping out every turn suicide for a blue deck? Is that a red splash for Pyroclasm and Blaze? Using Forbidden Orchard?!

It turns out that you can do these things when the best sorcery speed drops in the format are Compulsive Research and legendary blue creatures. It's not suicide, it's powerful! Other decks have to struggle to find better plays than this deck can make.

There's some kind of phenomenon that causes professional Magic players to puke at seeing the mainphase high curve of decks like Hattori Hanzo Tron, to not test them, and most importantly, to not build them in the first place.

Of course, we all now recognize this as the pre-Steam Vents skeleton of the powerhouse Izzetron deck. Osyp Lebedowitcz piloted such a deck to a Top 8 at Pro Tour – Honolulu. The deck evolved further to sport maindeck Wildfires, like the version Ben Lundquist and Tim Aten played at Southeast Regionals in 2006:

Izzetron – Benjamin Lundquist
2006 U.S. Nationals Top 8

Wildfire is, in my opinion, the best example of an archetypical midrange card. It's very nice to large creatures with 5 or more toughness but kills most of the weenies you'll find in an aggro deck. Wildfire comes online during the middle turns of the game, leaving both players crippled on resources, but the player with a fatty surges far ahead in board position. While both players are crippled, the fatty finishes off the opponent. However, against a control deck that draws cards and doesn't play weenies that die to Wildfire, all Wildfire does is force both players to sacrifice four lands, and leaves no player at any real advantage. Most control decks only care about the 4 Keiga and 2 Demonfire in this Izzetron deck, which can be beaten with a Cranial Extraction and an Eradicate.

Magic Pros love to play with good cards, but for the longest time midrange cards were simply not very good. From my experience, the viability of 6+ mana sorcery-speed cards depends on the quality and saturation of countermagic you expect to face. Counterspells are the bane of midrange decks. While Spiritmonger is an unprecedentedly powerful monster for 3 ManaBlack ManaGreen Mana, it's not nearly as powerful when the format is saturated with cards like Absorb, Undermine, Exclude, Dromar's Charm, Counterspell, and Repulse that answer it more than effectively.

Thorough history, aggro-control and midrange has to be obviously overpowered for Constructed players to latch onto it – witness such decks as U/G Madness. Decks like Maximillian Bracht's Erayo Ninjas and Jamie Wakefield's Secret Force look like 'utter piles' of 'bad cards' to the tuned eyes of competitive players despite the fact that they were competitive decklists in their respective metagames.

Theory #2

Midrange follows an unfamiliar game plan that isn't particularly powerful.

Now, this theory is going to be very difficult to explain. To help this theory along, I've drawn a grossly simplified graph to illustrate my point:

This colorful graph shows the three major deck archetypes: combo, aggro, and control. The bottom axis represents time, which in Magic is measured by how many turns have passed. The side axis represents an archetype's power level – how strong it is or how equipped it is to be "winning the game" on that turn (comparatively speaking). I admit, it's crude, but I hope you get my point.

Looking at the aggro archetype, we see that it begins the strongest and dramatically decreases with each passing turn before tapering off. The strongest turn one in Standard is Stomping Grounds + Kird Ape from a Zoo deck, representing the 100% spike that aggro often aims for. The downward taper shows Zoo's chance to topdeck one too many threats or a burn spell to win when the game lasts past turn five or so.

The Control archetype begins very low in power level but gradually increases with each passing turn. After some sufficient number of turns has passed, say ten, control has likely assembled enough resources and answers to contain all the opponent's threats to emerge victorious. The kill is inevitable even if the opponent still hasn't officially lost yet on turn ten. An example here is a blue-white deck that is holding more Counterspells than the opponent has threats left in his deck and is cranking out 2/2 Assembly-Workers with Urza's Factory.

The Combo archetype begins weak and ends weak, but it has a gigantic one-turn spike of game-winning power that normally determines right then and there if it wins or loses. There's certainly a chance for a combo deck like Dragonstorm to reassemble a foiled combo attempt, but for simplicity, we'll represent it as an all-or-nothing thing.

Next, here is the same graph with aggro-control's power curve inserted in blue:

The aggro-control archetype has a power curve that's different from the rest – it begins the game somewhere in the middle and gets stronger, but after some number of turns it normally tapers off again. Aggro-control decks like U/G Madness or a Simic Ohran Viper + Mystic Snake deck first deploy a clock, then try to disrupt or protect that clock long enough to go the distance.

Finally, let's complete the graph with the power curve for midrange in green:

Most midrange decks begin the game building up then firing off a short series of potent threats, represented by a rising curve into a plateau. It's similar to the aggro-control curve, just completely backwards.

For example, here's a typical sequence for a monogreen Scrub & Force deck:

Turn

  1. Llanowar Elves
  2. Call of the Herd
  3. Flashback Call of the Herd
  4. Spectral Force

Notice that this series of plays is relevant against an aggro deck that is attacking you but not very relevant against a combo deck that is, for example, storming up a lethal Dragonstorm. Likely, the fatty plan can be stopped by a simple sequence of Mana Leak, Cancel, Rewind from a control deck, and it's possible those will be the only threats the midrange deck can present before the control deck gains inevitability.

I have a theory that many Magic players, especially professional Magic players, don't feel 'empowered' by an aggro-control or midrange strategy. From the graph, we see that aggro, control, and combo each hit a 100% spike in power level at some point in the game. I believe the feeling of guaranteed victory, years of Magic theory, and the relative ease of building and playing toward that singular 100% goal are more appealing to Constructed Magic players.

From my experience, aggro-control is a difficult archetype to build and play because of its hybrid nature. It needs threats, disruption, and mana all in the correct ratios from turn one forward to work correctly. Aggro-control decks benefit hugely from cheap card selection like Brainstorm rather than raw card drawing like Concentrate.

Theory #3

Many players, due to lack of experience, misbuild their Midrange decks.

Because the theory, practice, and execution of midrange is less explored and understood than other archetypes, it's my belief that midrange decks aren't built optimally to begin with by most players. They put in cards that don't belong, which hurts the deck's performance, which causes it to lose games, which finally causes it to be abandoned as a poor deck.

From my experience, only master deckbuilders like Zvi Mowshowitcz, Katsuhiro Mori, and Mike Flores correctly build midrange decks. Most less experienced deckbuilders would never arrive at such a tuned decklist because they've never had to look past a particular card choice.

I searched high and low for an example to illustrate this point, and I found three separate midrange decks by these master deckbuilders that all made the same choice.

My Fires – Zvi Mowshowitz
Pro Tour - Chicago 2000


Katsuhiro Mori won Worlds 2005 with Ghazi-Glare, a green-white midrange deck in the most maligned two-color combination in tournament Magic history – a color combination that's often midrange by nature. Along with Yosei's Time Walk, Mori's deck gains a huge midgame burst of power through Congregation at Dawn, which ensures its next three turns will be the best creature drops it could cast.

Kuroda-style Big Red
Mike Flores

Kuroda-Style Big Red has a fat curve that begins with Sensei's Divining Top and Wayfarer's Bauble to set up Arc-slogger and big burn spells as its fatty threats. This is a deck were X-spells like Fireball and Demonfire shine. While many players think of this as a control deck, I see it as just how red does midrange. You can equate Beacon of Destruction to activating a Weatherseed Totem and attacking in a roundabout way. A better example of a red control deck would be centered around Lightning Rift alongside cycling cards.

Now, let's make a side-by-side comparison of these Midrange decks:

  • My Fires
  • Ghazi-Glare
  • Kuroda-style Big Red

We have

  • High curve
  • Fatties!
  • Setup for the Fatties

Now, what do the cards...

... have to do with these decks?

Nothing! That's what!

River Boa is the most powerful two-drop creature My Fires could play, but Zvi chose not to run it. The same is true for Watchwolf in Mori's Ghazi-Glare and Slith Firewalker in Flores's Kuroda-style Big Red.

I have an axiom I follow: "Play good decks, not good cards." All these decks have fully embraced the midrange strategy – the signature of master deckbuilders who know what their deck is trying to do.

Running good cards like River Boa, Watchwolf, and Slith Firewalker indicates that your deck is playing toward a power spike on turn two, but the reality is the rest of these decks aren't set up to maximize that same power spike. Instead of catering to the best two-drops in the format, these decks build toward maximizing Blastoderm, Arc-Slogger, and Yosei, the Morning Star, and have successfully done so in tournament play. These decks are set up to hit a power spike from turns three to six (give or take).

While there's an argument for simply playing all the most powerful cards, the simple truth is that Watchwolf, River Boa, and Slith Firewalker would be all alone in these decks. You will find pro players who chose to play these incredibly powerful two-drops, such as Jon Finkel's River Boas in My Fires or Antonino De Rosa's Watchwolfs in Ghazi-Glare, and it's hard to find fault in that choice. But to me, those choices separate the professional players from the master deckbuilders.

Conclusion

In a nutshell, the midrange archetype is the art of playing fatties. There's been a few tricks invented in Constructed tournament play over the years for the lucky fatty, but by and large fatties get most of their love in casual games, Limited, and from the great stories that are told about them.

Just remember the immortal words of one of midrange's biggest fans:

"It's the last fatty that kills you." – Jamie Wakefield

  • Planeswalker Points
  • Facebook Twitter
  • Gatherer: The Magic Card Database
  • Forums: Connect with the Magic Community
  • Magic Locator